TL;DR: The Waterfalls page carries a log of everything that's been enriched. Nine columns: contact, the four channels, the route that triggered it, who ran it, credits, and when. Click any value to copy it.
The columns
Column | What it tells you
**Contact** | The person. Links to their lead record where one exists
**Work email** · **Personal email** · **Mobile phone** | The values found. Click to copy
**Social handles** | Each handle with its platform — LinkedIn, X, YouTube, Instagram, Facebook
**Source** | Which route triggered this enrichment
**By** | Who or what ran it
**Credits** | What this record cost
**When** | Timestamp
Empty channels are simply blank — nothing was found, and nothing was charged for it.
Source — the route, not the provider
Source says where the enrichment came from in your workflow. Nine values: Waterfalls, Audiences, Signals, Qualification, Records, Lead detail, API, MCP, Extension. It's filterable, which is the fastest way to answer "what is my audience enrichment actually spending?"
Waterfalls is the one people miss. It's what a one-off run from the Waterfalls page is tagged with — so if you've been testing single lookups there, that's where the spend shows up.
It does not name the data provider. Which of the 15 cascaded providers returned a given email isn't exposed anywhere in the product.
By — who ran it
Either a teammate's initials, or the automated actor: Auto (qualified funnel), API key · <name>, Copilot · MCP tool, <name> · Chrome extension. Together with Credits, this is how you find out who or what is spending.
What the log does not carry
Set expectations before you go looking:
- No provider name per field. Not in the table, not in a tooltip, not in the CSV export.
- No confidence score. There's no 0–1 reliability number on a value.
- No enriched-at per field.
Whentimestamps the run, not the individual channel. - No bounce tracking or provider quality view. There's no Enrichment Quality report, and no way to flag a bad contact so a provider gets downweighted — provider selection isn't yours to influence.
If a work email bounces, the practical move is to re-run enrichment for that record and see whether the cascade returns something different, or fall back to another channel.
On a lead record
A lead's Enrichment panel shows the same values, and nothing more: the channels that are filled, each click-to-copy. No provider, no confidence, no timestamp.
Credits
Charged per match, at a flat rate: work email 1, social handles 2, personal email 5, mobile phone 10. The Credits column is the sum for that record, which is why a row with three channels found costs more than one with a single email.
Misses cost nothing, so a row's credit figure only ever reflects what was actually returned.